Impact of prophylactic hydroxychloroquine on ultrastructural impairment and cellular SARS

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 12733 (2023) Cite this article

2 Altmetric

Metrics details

Many drugs were recommended as antiviral agents for infection control and effective therapy to reduce the mortality rate for COVID-19 patients. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), an antimalarial drug, has been controversially recommended for prophylactic use in many countries, including India, to control SARS-CoV-2 infections. We have explored the effect of prophylactic HCQ from the cells of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome patients to determine the level of infection and ultrastructural alterations in the ciliated epithelium, type II pneumocytes, alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, and enucleated granulocytes. Ultrastructural investigation of ciliated epithelium and type II pneumocytes showed lesser infections and cellular impairment in the prophylactic HCQ+ group than HCQ− group. However, macrophages and neutrophils displayed similar infection and ultrastructural alterations in both patient groups. The enucleated fragments of granulocytes showed phagocytosis of the matured virus in HCQ+ groups. The present report unveils the ultrastructural proof to complement the paradox regarding the role of prophylactic HCQ in COVID-19 patients.

The COVID-19 outbreak caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly propagated with nearly half a billion infected human beings globally1. There were negligible reports on specific and effective treatments for this deadly infection. Due to sudden outbreaks and very high mortality (29%)2 by delta variant, many random trials and repurposing of existing drugs were conducted to control and cure the COVID-19 disease2,3. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), an antimalarial drug, has gained significant attention in the initial phase of COVID-19 from May 2020 onwards4,5. This drug was earlier reported to be effective (in vitro) in reducing viral internalization (by blocking proteolytic activation of S-protein) and replication (increasing the acidic environment of the endosome to inhibit viral assembly), including the SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV6,7,8. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect of HCQ (by inhibiting internalization and proliferation) was proposed due to its ability to increase endosomal acidification, reduction of cathepsin L activation, interference with ACE-2 terminal glycosylation, proteolytic self-activation of furin, and the blockage of clathrin-mediated endocytosis4,9,10,11. The immunomodulatory effects, alkalinization of vacuolar pH, Zinc ionophores, and binding ability of HCQ to sialic acids were proposed to inhibit the COVID-19 infection in vitro non-specifically9,12,13,14.

Many clinical trials were initiated in various countries to investigate the effect of HCQ in the control and cure of COVID-19 disease15,16,17. It was reported that HCQ was very effective in reducing the multiplication of the SARS-COV-2 virus under in vitro culture conditions using Vero E6 cells with 6.90 µM concentration (EC)9018. This drug was prescribed in China at 500 mg twice daily for ten days for mild, moderate, and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Dutch center for disease control suggested 600 mg of chloroquine base (6 tablets A-CQ 100 mg) followed by 300 mg after 12 h on day 1, then 300 mg on days 2–5. To overcome the surge of COVID-19 in 2020, the Indian Council of Medical Research released an advisory to concede HCQ (400 mg twice on day one following the 400 mg dose once a week up to 3 to 7 weeks) as a prophylaxis dose before any symptoms arise to reduce the infection risk19. This type of oral dosing was reported to achieve a favorable pharmacological concentration in vivo due to the very effective pharmacology of this drug20,21,22.

Hydroxy chloroquine (HCQ), a chloroquine derivative, was found more effective because of its better water solubility, low toxicity, and more prolonged circulation5,8,18,23. A randomized clinical trial by Pujol et al. shows the safety of HCQ in the low-level dosage24. The study by Serrano et al. reported the efficiency of HCQ in minimizing viral infectivity to some extent25. Considering many similar pharmacological findings, this drug was offensively introduced as a prophylactic agent to control the SARS-CoV-2 viral infection despite associated side effects. However, the negligible impact of HCQ on COVID-19 was reported using calu-3 cell lines (lung adenocarcinoma) and in vivo cynomolgus macaque in the late months of the year 202011,26. Several studies have disclosed doubt about HCQ action in controlling the COVID-19 infection27. Due to insignificant mortality reduction in admitted COVID-19 patients, WHO (world health organization) had also announced the insufficiency of the HCQ in the treatment of COVID disease28. However, the dissatisfaction with HCQ efficiency by the number of clinical trials studies should not be taken as the non-effectiveness of this drug as a broad-spectrum antiviral agent. The study by Pandolfi et al. on cellular and variable cytokines levels in the BALF implies that the anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect of HCQ drug could be explored through an ultrastructural examination of HCQ-treated patients29,30. Several reports published in mid-2020 (March to October 2020) supported the positive effects of HCQ in controlling the infection and multiplication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus4,16,31,32,33,34,35,36. Liu et al. demonstrated in vitro that HCQ blocks the transport of SARS-CoV-2 from early endosomes to endo-lysosomes resulting in an abnormally enlarged, more significant number of early endosomal vesicle4. A study done by Ruiz et al. (2021) revealed the presence of a pharmacological concentration of HCQ in the fluid of epithelial lining and the lung (higher than epithelium) of intubated COVID-19 patients37. However, many editorial and initial reports suspected the efficacy of HCQ in COVID-19. They warned about the adverse effect of indiscriminate usage supported by research showing the ineffectiveness of the HCQ in the control or cure of COVID-198,38,39,40,41,42. Several clinical trials showed an insignificant effect of HCQ in COVID-19 patients27. Considering the controversial report on the impact of HCQ on COVID-19 under in vitro and in vivo conditions, this study was designed to explore the effect of HCQ on the ultrastructural level of the various cells from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) of severely infected and intubated COVID-19 patients. We have compared the ultrastructures of ciliated epithelium, type II pneumocytes, alveolar macrophage, neutrophils, and enucleated granulocytes from the BALF of the mildly infected non-ARDS (intubated due to trauma condition, HCQ−), severe ARDS patients with and without prophylactic HCQ.

The effect of prophylactically taken HCQ (taken by the healthy individual before SARS-CoV-2 infection, HCQ+) on different cells from the BALF of severe ARDS (intubated) patients was evaluated on the level of infection and ultrastructural alterations. These ultrastructural findings were compared with the severe ARDS patients who have not taken HCQ as a prophylactic dose (HCQ−). Patients who had taken prophylactic HCQ and later developed SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS were recruited for this study (Supplementary Tables S2 & S3). All the ARDS patients who were given HCQ after the infection were excluded from the study. Mild COVID-19 patients (non-ARDS) were also recruited in this study to evaluate the impact of SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS on the level of infection and ultrastructural modulation of BALF cells. These patients were intubated due to trauma and subsequently infected with SARS-CoV-2, showing mild clinical symptoms (Fig. 1). The effects of HCQ on the ultrastructure of ciliated epithelium, type II pneumocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and enucleated granulocytes cells were examined in this study.

Study design to evaluate the effect of prophylactic HCQ on the ultrastructure of various BALF cells. The BALF samples (32 samples) were collected from the intubated patients. The patients were finally grouped under the (a) Non-ARDS, HCQ− group (b) ARDS, HCQ− group and (c) ARDS, HCQ+ group. The mild COVID-19 patients (A) were intubated due to traumatic condition (not due to COVID-19 induced ARDS) but found COVID-19 positive through RT-PCR. The BALF of these patients were taken to explore the ultrastructural changes between the prophylactic HCQ+ and HCQ− groups. The three groups were selected to differentiate the effect of the prophylactic HCQ on the ultrastructural changes in ciliated epithelium, type 2 pneumocytes, alveolar macrophage, neutrophils, and non-nucleated cytoplasmic fragments) of the BALF. The number of patients recruited in this study was indicated along with each subgroup.

The ciliated epithelial cells from the BALF of mild infection (non-ARDS, HCQ−) patients showed intact cellular structure, vacuolated cytoplasm with a dense nucleus (in PAP imaging), and a mild cellular infection (Table 1) under immunofluorescence (IF) imaging (Fig. 2a). The surface ultrastructure under SEM imaging showed many virus-like structures in the body of cells and cilia (Fig. 2a). TEM imaging of these cells exhibited healthy mitochondria, many basal ciliary complexes (identifiable features for ciliated cells), and some virus-like structures (< 100 nm) on the plasma membrane and in peripheral cytoplasm. We could not find any virus-like particles containing membrane-bound vesicles in these cells (Fig. 2a). These cells from the ARDS patients without HCQ (HCQ−)showed a highly vacuolated cytoplasm (indicative of higher viral load), with a dense nucleus under light microscopy and higher immunofluorescence (high infection) (Fig. 2b). A scanning electron microscope showed skeletal cellular morphology with many virus-like particles on the body and cilia of the cells (Fig. 2b). TEM revealed many membrane-bound vesicles with granular virus-like particles (arrow). Many ciliary basal bodies were seen as identifiable features of ciliary cells. The disappearance of the plasma membrane and swollen mitochondria showed typical initial apoptotic-like characteristics indicative of higher viral infection (Fig. 2b).

Ciliated epithelium from the BALF of intubated COVID-19 patient. (a) Mild infection (non-ARDS) HCQ− group (b) Severe infection (ARDS) HCQ− and (c) Severe infection (ARDS) with prophylactic HCQ+ group. Ciliated epithelium of each group of patients was imaged using the PAP test for identification of various cells in BALF (PAP), Immunofluorescence (merged image of DIC, DAPI, and Alexa flor 598) imaging using SARS-CoV-2 virus S protein-specific antibody for the determination of the level of infection through Fiji software (IF), Scanning electron microscopy for surface imaging of virus and to visualize the cellular morphology (SEM), and cellular ultrastructural details using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The level of infections was highest in patient group B, followed by groups A and C. The cilia were mostly intact in each group of patients. SARS-CoV-2-like virus particles were seen on the surface and in the cell membrane (arrows). The ultrastructural damage was more prominent in patient group b, followed by groups c and a. N Nucleus, C Cilia, M Mitochondria, arrows SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The severe ARDS patients with prophylactic HCQ (HCQ+) showed relatively healthy ciliated epithelial cells in PAP imaging with active cytoplasm and normal nucleus with the nucleolus. These cells showed significantly less immunofluorescence, indicative of the mild infection in these cells. The surface ultrastructure of these cells showed a healthy appearance of the cells with very few virus-like particles on the plasma membrane and cilia. Transmission electron microscope imaging showed healthy mitochondria, dense cytoplasm, eccentric nucleus, negligible membrane-bound vesicles, many virus-like structures on the outer surface of the plasma membrane, and typical vacuoles (Fig. 2c).

Type II pneumocytes of mild COVID-19 patients (non-ARDS, HCQ−) exhibited a dense nucleus with vacuolated cytoplasm and mild immunofluorescence. However, the surface ultra-structures of these cells were covered with typical multiple microvilli-like morphologies, which suggest healthy cells (Fig. 3a). TEM imaging revealed the eccentric nucleus, with many intact surfactant granules, lipid body, healthy mitochondria, and residual bodies. The presence of many ferritin granules indicates the oxidative stress condition of the cells at the mild infection stage. Many virus-like particles were present on the plasma membrane of these cells and in cytoplasmic projections (Fig. 3a). However, type II pneumocytes altered their morphology in severe ARDS conditions (HCQ−). It shows moderate to high immunofluorescence as a sign of higher infection (Table 1). SEM revealed the swollen morphology, loss of curvatures, reduction in microvilli, and cell size enlargement. TEM showed a complete disintegrated nucleus, many membrane-bound vesicles, plenty of virus-like particles in the membrane-bound vesicles, vacuolized cytoplasm, lean lipid body, and many released surfactant granules. All these findings indicate the high stress and initial apoptotic condition of these cells under the influence of high SARS-CoV-2 infections (Fig. 3b).

Type II pneumocytes from the BALF of intubated COVID-19 patients. (a) Mild infection (non-ARDS) HCQ− group (b) Severe infection (ARDS) without HCQ (HCQ−) and (c) Severe infection (ARDS) with prophylactic HCQ (HCQ+) group. These cells showed a membrane projection, a characteristic feature of type II pneumocytes. The infection was highest in group B patients, followed by groups A and C. This indicates the effectiveness of HCQ in protecting the infection in these cells from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. SEM imaging confirms the presence of a microvilli-like structure along with virus-like particles on the surface (arrow). The characteristics of the lamellar body were intact and had clear, distinguishable morphology in group C; however, these were released in group B patients. N Nucleus, M Mitochondria, L Lipid body, LB Lamellar body, arrows SARS-CoV-2 virus.

However, the patient in the prophylactic HCQ+ group presented healthier cells and nucleus in optical microscope imaging, with significantly less immunofluorescence. Minor infection may be due to the lesser internalization and multiplication of the SARS-CoV-2 under the influence of HCQ. These cells from the prophylactic HCQ+ patients showed normal surface morphology under SEM imaging. However, some cells showed necrosis with plenty of surfactant granules under TEM imaging (Fig. 3c). Many cells showed intact morphology with a stressed nucleus but intact surfactant granules.

To identify and compare the ultrastructural alterations in alveolar macrophage of mild, severe ARDS (HCQ−) and prophylactic HCQ+ patients were imaged using PAP, IF, SEM and TEM to observe the number of surface projections, ultrastructure, and cytoplasm along with the presence of virus-like particles. The macrophage of mild infection patients showed relatively vascular cytoplasm and dense nucleus with moderate to heavy infections (Table 1). The surface morphology by SEM imaging showed a typical rough surface with the presence of very few virus-like structures. TEM revealed a horseshoe-shaped nucleus with peripheral euchromatin, nucleolus, dense cytoplasm, multiple phagosomes, and less cytoplasmic projection indicative of healthy cells (Fig. 4a). The ARDS patients (HCQ−) showed proliferative alveolar macrophage cells with very high immunofluorescence. The surface morphology showed the typical hyperactive macrophage with plenty of viruses on the surface. These cells showed an initial apoptotic nucleus with large size phagosomes filled with virus-like particles (arrow). This specifies the highly proliferative condition of these cells under the influence of cytokine storms (Fig. 4b). This macrophage from the prophylactic HCQ+ patients showed moderate infection and proliferative surface morphology. However, TEM revealed a healthy nucleus and cells with plenty of filled phagosomes. The ultrastructural alteration was similar to that of the HCQ− group (Fig. 4c).

Macrophages/monocytes from the BALF of intubated COVID-19 patients. (a) Mild infection (non-ARDS) and HCQ− group (b) Severe infection (ARDS) patients without HCQ (HCQ−) and (c) Severe infection (ARDS) with prophylactic HCQ (HCQ+) group. The IF study showed a severe infection in all the patient groups, indicating the ineffective role of HCQ in the alveolar macrophage. SEM images showed multiple virus-like structures on the cell surface (arrows) with similar surface morphology in ARDS patients (b, c). TEM images reveal phagosomes on the cell cytoplasm with many viruses (arrows). There was similar ultrastructural damage in ARDS patient groups (b, c). The non-ARDS group (a) showed intact cellular ultrastructure even with higher infection. N Nucleus, M Mitochondria, RB Residual Body, P Phagosome, arrows SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Neutrophils from the BALF sample of mild infectious patients showed vascular cytoplasm with a multi-lobed nucleus with mild immunofluorescence. The surface morphology showed a shrunken cellular body under SEM imaging. Their nuclei exhibited stress-like conditions with a peripheral accumulation of the heterochromatin and centrally located euchromatin. The presence of multiple and scattered healthy mitochondria with other cytoplasmic organelles confirms the activated neutrophils without neutrophils extracellular traps (NETs) (Fig. 5a). However, dense nuclei and condensed cytoplasms under light microscopy from the severe ARDS patients confirmed the high proliferative condition of these cells with many NETs-like structures. These cells also showed relatively higher immunofluorescence, suggestive of severe infection. The surface ultrastructure showed many NETs-like structures designating the high-stress conditions in these cells. TEM revealed a more heterochromatic nucleus, indicating the initial apoptotic condition with many vacuoles having virus-like structures and many NETs. The fewer mitochondria with many viruses on the cell surface confirm the initial apoptotic condition caused by SARS-CoV2 viral infection (Fig. 5b).

Neutrophils from the BALF of intubated COVID-19 patient. (a) Mild infection (non-ARDS) HCQ− group (b) Severe infection (ARDS) patients without HCQ (HCQ−) and (c) Severe infection (ARDS) with prophylactic HCQ (HCQ+) group. Multilobed disintegrating nucleus with external NETs was observed in all the patient's subgroups. The level of infection (IF) was significant in ARDS groups (b) and (c) and mild in group (a). HCQ has no effects on neutrophil cells for the control of infection and virus internalization. SEM images showed multiple virus-like structures on the cell surface. TEM images reveal phagosomes on the cell cytoplasm with many viruses (arrows). HCQ did not show a protective effect on the infection of these cells. N Nucleus, M Mitochondria, RB Residual Body, P Phagosome, Nt neutrophil extracellular traps, arrows SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Neutrophils from the severe ARDS patients with prophylactically taken HCQ+ group displayed better cellular and nuclear morphology with relatively moderate infections, as indicated by the immunofluorescence (Table 1). However, the surface morphology revealed plenty of small NETs like projections. These NETs' projections were also appreciated in the transmission electron microscope imaging with plenty of vacuoles containing immature virus-like particles, heterochromatin-rich nuclei, and many small mitochondria. These neutrophils showed a similar proliferative condition to that of HCQ− group (Fig. 5c).

BALF contains many enucleated cells derived from the granulocytes of the blood after the degradation of the nucleus under the influence of a higher infection of SARS-CoV-2. These cytoplasmic structures showed intense fluorescence, suggesting high viral loads. We could not find enucleated granulocytes in the mild infection patients. The ARDS patients showed high immunofluorescence with NETs-like structures on the surface. TEM revealed plenty of viruses in the membrane-bound vesicles without the nucleus. We have sectioned and imaged these cells entirely but could not locate the presence of a nucleus by TEM. Some peripheral vacuoles showed the virus's release on the cells' surface (Fig. 6a). The patients with prophylactic HCQ showed granular cytoplasm, moderated to severe infection as signified by high immunofluorescence. The surface morphology was a typical rounded structure with plenty of mature virus-like particles. TEM exhibited eccentrically tiny fragments of slight nuclear residue, with plenty of vesicles, phagosomes, and small virus particles, confirming the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The HCQ+ group cells showed very high phagocytosis of the mature SARS-CoV-2 virus (Fig. 6b).

Enucleated granulocytes from the BALF of intubated COVID-19 patient. (a) ARDS patients without HCQ (HCQ−) and (b) ARDS with prophylactic HCQ (HCQ+) group. Many non-nucleated cells were observed in the BALF, having the highest level of SARS-CoV-2 infection in comparison to other cells. These cells showed granulocytes origin showing CD15 positive. TEM imaging showed highly vacuolated phagosomes in both groups. However, the HCQ-treated group cells showed entirely filled phagosomes with mature viruses. Arrows SARS-CoV-2 virus.

In this comparative study, the effects of HCQ on different cells found in the BALF of COVID-19 patients with respect to the level of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection, impact on the cell surface, and other cell organelles (ultrastructure) were evaluated by light and electron microscopy. This study was done on the BALF samples of COVID-19-positive intubated patients to understand the effect of HCQ+ versus HCQ− by ultrastructural comparison and level of infection. BALF proved to be a valuable sample for studying the SARS-CoV-2 virus proliferation and the effects of prophylactic HCQ on COVID-19. The electron microscopical examination of the SARS-CoV-2-infected cells was performed to evaluate the impact of HCQ on the ultrastructural changes and viral spread in severe ARDS patients. Ciliated epithelium cells of prophylactic HCQ+ patients showed a significantly lower infection (immunofluorescence) and healthy nucleus/cytoplasm than the HCQ− group (Fig. 2). This specifies that prophylactic HCQ plays a preventive role in the internalization of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in ciliated epithelium. Relatively fewer virions in characteristic membrane-bound vesicles, viral lining on the cell surface, and a lower number of double-membrane vesicles in HCQ+ patients provide clear evidence of the reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Fig. 2). This also suggest the reduction of replication of viral particles in the ciliated epithelium of the HCQ+ group during the late phase of the infection. SARS-CoV-2-infected cells usually show an irregular morphology with spreading from the edge to the center of the cell layer. These infected cells also showed a gradual appearance of small aggregates, and increased interstitial particles. The diseased cells became rounded, condensed, detached, or fused43. In our study, the HCQ+ cells showed relatively lesser changes which indirectly proves the impact of HCQ on the control of infection in these cells at the ultrastructural level (Fig. 2).

Type II pneumocytes cells release surfactants, which play a significant role in immune defense, and airway regeneration during lung injury44. These cells from the HCQ+ group showed relatively healthy cytoplasm with lesser infection than mild and ARDS patients without prophylactic HCQ (HCQ− group). This provides direct evidence of the infection control by the prophylactic HCQ+ in these cells. It was already reported that Type II pneumocytes have a higher level of HCQ in the prophylactic group of patients than any other cells of the lungs37. A significantly lower number of characteristic hemilamellar bodies (generated due to viral infection) were observed among these cells under electron microscopy compared to severe ARDS patients (Fig. 3). These organelles were filled with unequal numbers of mature virions in the markedly expanded rough endoplasmic reticulum and vesicles. The viral particles in these cells were observed as circular objects in the vesicles, which may be poly-vacuolar bodies or autophagic vesicles that engulfed particles. TEM imaging of these cells showed that SARS-CoV-2 internalized in cells through membrane fusion and matured in vesicles (Fig. 3).

Histopathological analysis of BALF of ARDS patients revealed fibroproliferative responses of alveolar macrophages with diffuse alveolar damage in all the groups of patients. The negligible ultrastructure changes in alveolar macrophages of mild infection patients may be due to a low level of infection. The ultrastructures revealed that these macrophages were not activated. Monocytes and macrophage activation have been reported as the primary cause of ARDS-like inflammatory syndrome by expressing 2 to 3 times more inflammatory cytokines45,46. However, in severe ARDS patients, the foamy appearance indicates the hyperactive and apoptotic macrophage. This is due to various sizes of vesicles and fibrin accumulation in the vicinity of cell membrane. Similar morphology of these macrophages in the HCQ+ group revealed no effect of the HCQ in the cellular ultrastructure (Fig. 4).

The viral replication inside the cells alarms a cellular injury that leads to the second line of the innate response by releasing inflammatory mediators. Due to inflammation, circulating neutrophils and monocytes rush to the site of infection, where they start phagocytosis of the invading virus. The normal cellular ultrastructure of neutrophils of the mild infection patients group indicated less inflammation. However, an apparent cytopathic effect was observed in the severe and HCQ+ patients group showing no infection protection effect of HCQ on these cells. The vacuolar cytoplasm with plenty of virus-like structure and NETs were indicators of activated neutrophils (Fig. 5).

Multiple anucleate cells or their fragments with a very high level of infection in severe ARDS patients with and without HCQ indicate the negligible impact of HCQs in these cells. These cells have identified a granulocyte due to CD 15 positive in the immunohistochemistry47. The phagocytic vesicles were filled with mature viruses indicating that HCQs may increase the phagocytic activity of granulocytes (Fig. 6).

This study highlighted the level of SARS-CoV-2 infection and ultrastructural alteration in the prophylactic HCQ+ group in comparison to the HCQ− group of the ciliated epithelium, type II pneumocytes, alveolar macrophage, neutrophil and anucleated granulocytes individually. We found the significant antiviral activity of HCQ as a protective role rather than a degenerating effect on the ciliated epithelium and type II pneumocytes in which low infection level and relatively intact cellular ultrastructure were observed. The ultrastructure of alveolar macrophages and neutrophils were degenerated in ARDS patients of both the HCQ+ and HCQ− group. However, enucleated fragments of granulocytes showed a higher tendency of phagocytosis of the mature SARS-COV-2 virus in the HCQ+ group.

BSA and ethanol were procured from Himedia. Triton X-100 was procured from Fisher Scientific. Osmium tetroxide was procured from Ted Pella, USA. Uranyl acetate was from TAAB, UK, and lead citrate from Ladd. Polyclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific primary antibody (Cat no. ab275759) and Alexa fluor-594 conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Cat no. ab150080) were procured from Abcam, Plc, UK. Karnovsky’s fixative (0.5% glutaraldehyde + 2.0% paraformaldehyde), hematoxylin, eosin, orange G, Scott’s water, xylene, DPX, PBS, poly-l-lysine, epoxy embedding kit, and DAPI were purchased from Sigma chemical company, MO, USA.

BALF from the mild and severe SARS-CoV-2 infected (COVID-19 positive) and intubated patients from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were collected after taking informed consent from all participants or patient representatives. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India (Ref. No. IEC-307/27.04.2020, RP-10/202). We are confirming that all experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

BALF samples were collected from intubated SARS-CoV-2 positive patients in the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU), AIIMS, New Delhi. All samples were collected between 3rd October 2020 and 31st January 2021 (Supplementary Table S1). The patients were categorized into three groups such as (A) mild infection non-ARDS patients (non-ARDS, HCQ−, 11 patients), (B) severe infection with ARDS without prophylactic HCQS (ARDS, HCQ−, 15 patients), and (C) Severe ARDS patients that had taken HCQS before the SARS-CoV-2 infection as prophylactic dose (ARDS, HCQ+, 06 patients) (Fig. 1). RT-PCR test was performed to confirm the COVID-19 infection for all the patients recruited in the study. The patients who had taken HCQ after the COVID-19 symptoms were excluded from the study. The ARDS patients were intubated due to hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90%), high oxygen requirement (flow rate 20–25 L/min), and deteriorating breathing problems.

The BALF (15–20 mL) was primarily fixed in freshly prepared 20 mL, 2X Karnovsky’s solution (final 5% glutaraldehyde + 4.0% formaldehyde) in 0.2 M phosphate buffer. The surface of sample vials was sterilized by alcohol/soap solution by incubating for two hours at room temperature and stored at 4 °C in a COVID-19 designated refrigerator. The medical records of all patients were reviewed and cross-checked by an on-duty medical physician.

After the primary fixation, the BALF solution was diluted ten times with 0.1 M NaCl solution and strained through a nylon mesh cell strainer with a 100 µm pore. The filtrate was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 3 min in a swinging bucket. The cell pellets were washed 2–3 times for 10 min with PBS solution to remove the excess mucus. The cellular content was enriched by centrifugation at 1200×g for 3 min and resuspended again in the primary fixative A (0.5% glutaraldehyde and 2.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PB buffer). These samples were processed for PAP staining, immunofluorescence (IF), scanning- and transmission electron microscopy (SEM, TEM).

BALF was washed three times with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, and smears were prepared using 10 µL of sample on poly-l-lysine coated glass slides and air-dried at room temperature (RT). Smears were permeabilized by PBST (0.1% Triton X-100 in 1 × phosphate buffer saline, PBS) and after protein blocking with 2% BSA in PBS for 30 min, incubated with primary antibody (Abcam ab275759, polyclonal against S1 spike protein, dilution 1:500) for four hours in a humid chamber at room temperature. After washing with PBS fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody (Alexa fluor-594 conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody, Abcam, Cat No.-150080; dilution 1:500;) was added for 1 h at RT in the darkroom. Smears were washed with phosphate buffer, and DAPI (1 μg/mL) was added for 5 min. Excess DAPI was washed with PBS, and smears were mounted with 90% glycerol. Fluorescence imaging was performed on a laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica SP8 Germany).

For SEM, the enriched and primary fixed cellular components of BALF were osmicated, dehydrated with ethanol, critical point dried (E-3100, Quorum Tech), and mounted on double-sided tape on the aluminum stubs. These stubs were sputter-coated with a gold-based sputter coater (HHV BT-150) for 180 s. Electron micrographs were obtained on EVO18 (Zeiss, Germany) SEM operated at 20 kV accelerating voltage, between 8 and 10 mm average working distance with SE detector, and magnifications ranging from 5000 × to 30,000 ×.

To prepare the specimens for TEM imaging, enriched cellular constituents of BALF were primarily fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde + 2.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB). The fixed cellular pellets were washed with 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) and post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) for one hour (secondary fixation) at 4 °C. For two hours, pellets were washed with distilled water, and en bloc staining was done with 2% uranyl acetate in 50% ethanol. These samples were again washed with distilled water and dehydrated in an ethanol series (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%). These pellets were infiltrated with toluene/resin and finally embedded in Araldite CY212 resin. The blocks were polymerized at 65 °C for 48 h. Resin blocks were trimmed, and 70 nm thin sections were prepared using UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica). The sections were mounted on grids and stained with 5% uranyl acetate and 5% lead citrate. Cells were imaged using Talos F200 Transmission Electron Microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a FEG filament operated at 200 kV.

The datasets (Microscopic images of PAP, IF, SEM, and TEM) used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/.

Jha, P. et al. COVID mortality in India: National survey data and health facility deaths. Science 375, 667–671. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm5154 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tabatabai, M. et al. An analysis of COVID-19 mortality during the dominancy of alpha, delta, and omicron in the USA. J. Prim. Care Community Health 14, 21501319231170164. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319231170164 (2023).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Liu, J. et al. Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Cell Discov. 6, 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-0156-0 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yao, X. et al. In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa237 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Colson, P., Rolain, J. M. & Raoult, D. Chloroquine for the 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 55, 105923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105923 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Savarino, A., Boelaert, J. R., Cassone, A., Majori, G. & Cauda, R. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: An old drug against today’s diseases?. Lancet Infect. Dis. 3, 722–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00806-5 (2003).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ferner, R. E. & Aronson, J. K. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in covid-19. BMJ 369, 1432. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1432 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Altulea, D., Maassen, S., Baranov, M. V. & van den Bogaart, G. What makes (hydroxy)chloroquine ineffective against COVID-19: Insights from cell biology. J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjab016 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ferreira, A., Oliveira, E. S. A. & Bettencourt, P. Chronic treatment with hydroxychloroquine and SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Med. Virol. 93, 755–759. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26286 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Maisonnasse, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates. Nature 585, 584–587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2558-4 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Mauthe, M. et al. Chloroquine inhibits autophagic flux by decreasing autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy 14, 1435–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2018.1474314 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Vabret, N. et al. Immunology of COVID-19: Current state of the science. Immunity 52, 910–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.002 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wolfram, J. et al. A chloroquine-induced macrophage-preconditioning strategy for improved nanodelivery. Sci. Rep. 7, 13738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14221-2 (2017).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cortegiani, A., Ingoglia, G., Ippolito, M., Giarratano, A. & Einav, S. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19. J. Crit. Care 57, 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.005 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gautret, P. et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 56, 105949–105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Chen, J. et al. A pilot study of hydroxychloroquine in treatment of patients with moderate COVID-19. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 49, 215–219. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.03.03 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, M. et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell. Res. 30, 269–271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

National Task Force Against COVID-19. Advisory on the Use of Hydroxy-Chloroquine as Prophylaxis for SARS-CoV-2 Infection. (2020).

Zhou, D., Dai, S. M. & Tong, Q. COVID-19: A recommendation to examine the effect of hydroxychloroquine in preventing infection and progression. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 1667–1670. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa114 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Schrezenmeier, E. & Dorner, T. Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: Implications for rheumatology. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0372-x (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Infante, M., Ricordi, C., Alejandro, R., Caprio, M. & Fabbri, A. Hydroxychloroquine in the COVID-19 pandemic era: In pursuit of a rational use for prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 19, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2020.1799785 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Savarino, A., Di Trani, L., Donatelli, I., Cauda, R. & Cassone, A. New insights into the antiviral effects of chloroquine. Lancet Infect. Dis. 6, 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70361-9 (2006).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Grau-Pujol, B. et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Trials 22, 808. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05758-9 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rojas-Serrano, J. et al. Hydroxychloroquine for prophylaxis of COVID-19 in health workers: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE 17, e0261980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261980 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hoffmann, M. et al. Chloroquine does not inhibit infection of human lung cells with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 585, 588–590. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2575-3 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tang, W. et al. Hydroxychloroquine in patients with mainly mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019: Open label, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 369, 1849. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1849 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

World Health Organisation. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Solidarity Trial and Hydroxychloroquine. Accessed 19 Jun 2020.

Catteau, L. et al. Low-dose hydroxychloroquine therapy and mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: A nationwide observational study of 8075 participants. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 56, 106144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106144 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pandolfi, L. et al. Broncho-alveolar inflammation in COVID-19 patients: A correlation with clinical outcome. BMC Pulm. Med. 20, 301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01343-z (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gao, J. & Hu, S. Update on use of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Biosci. Trends 14, 156–158. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2020.03072 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gao, J., Tian, Z. & Yang, X. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci. Trends 14, 72–73. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2020.01047 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Keyaerts, E., Vijgen, L., Maes, P., Neyts, J. & Van Ranst, M. In vitro inhibition of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus by chloroquine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 323, 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.085 (2004).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Keyaerts, E. et al. Antiviral activity of chloroquine against human coronavirus OC43 infection in newborn mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 3416–3421. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01509-08 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Verscheijden, L. F. M. et al. Chloroquine dosing recommendations for pediatric COVID-19 supported by modeling and simulation. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 108, 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1864 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Vincent, M. J. et al. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol. J. 2, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ruiz, S. et al. Hydroxychloroquine lung pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 57, 106247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106247 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yazdany, J. & Kim, A. H. J. Use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic: What every clinician should know. Ann. Intern. Med. 172, 754–755. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1334 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Molina, J. M. et al. No evidence of rapid antiviral clearance or clinical benefit with the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. Med. Mal. Infect. 50, 384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2020.03.006 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Guastalegname, M. & Vallone, A. Could chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine be harmful in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment?. Clin. Infect. Dis. 71, 888–889. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa321 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Falcao, M. B., de Goes Cavalcanti, L. P., Filgueiras Filho, N. M. & de Brito, C. A. A. Case report: Hepatotoxicity associated with the use of hydroxychloroquine in a patient with COVID-19. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 102, 1214–1216. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0276 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kim, A. H. J. et al. A rush to judgment? Rapid reporting and dissemination of results and its consequences regarding the use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19. Ann. Intern. Med. 172, 819–821. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1223 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Zhao, J. et al. Cell morphological analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection by transmission electron microscopy. J. Thorac. Dis. 12, 4368–4373. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1368 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Carcaterra, M. & Caruso, C. Alveolar epithelial cell type II as main target of SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 development via NF-Kb pathway deregulation: A physio-pathological theory. Med. Hypotheses 146, 110412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110412 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Blanco-Melo, D. et al. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 181, 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.026 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Mehta, P. et al. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 395, 1033–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Chaudhary, S. et al. Ultracellular imaging of bronchoalveolar lavage from young age COVID-19 patients with comorbidities showed greater SARS-COV-2 infection but lesser ultrastructural damage than the old age patients. Microsc. Microanal. 28, 2105–2129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927622012430 (2022).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Download references

We thank all patients' relatives for permitting us to collect BALF from the patients. This work was supported by grants from the IUSSTF Indo-US Virtual Network for the COVID-19 program (IUSSTF/VN-COVID/007/2020). Other funding by DBT (BT/INF/22/SP44285/2021), ICMR, SERB, and AIIMS intramural grants is acknowledged. SAIF-AIIMS New Delhi is acknowledged as the imaging facility for the SEM and TEM. DST-FIST confocal microscope facility is also acknowledged for the facility for immunofluorescence. We acknowledged Dr. Kapil Soni and Prof. Anjan Trikha for permission to collect the BALF samples from the respective wards.

IUSSTF Indo-US Virtual Network for the COVID-19 program (IUSSTF/VN-COVID/007/2020) and DBT SAHAJ (BT/INF/22/SP44285/2021).

Electron Microscope Facility, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, 110029, India

Shikha Chaudhary, Arti Joshi, Kishore Sesham, Preeti Rai, Tapas Chandra Nag & Subhash Chandra Yadav

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, 110029, India

Shailendra Kumar

Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, 110029, India

Asit Ranjan Mridha

Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, 110029, India

Upendra Baitha

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

S.C. performed the experiments for sample processing, PAP and IF imaging standardization, electron microscopy, interpretation of the data, management of clinical records, and generation of the microscopy figures. P.R. performed the immunofluorescence imaging, recorded the clinical data, and helped S.C. with electron microscopy-related experiments. A.J. performed the PAP imaging. K.S. collected the sample from the ICU wards. S.K. was involved in designing the study and standardizing the sample collection strategies. A.R.M. and T.C.N. helped interpret the results and the images and correction of manuscripts. A.R.M. and U.B. also helped in the correction of the manuscript. S.C.Y. designed the study, performed, and supervised COVID-19 patient experiments, analyzed the data, generated the figures, wrote the manuscript, and directed the project. All authors read and approved the final draft of this manuscript.

Correspondence to Subhash Chandra Yadav.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Chaudhary, S., Joshi, A., Sesham, K. et al. Impact of prophylactic hydroxychloroquine on ultrastructural impairment and cellular SARS-CoV-2 infection in different cells of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids of COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep 13, 12733 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39941-6

Download citation

Received: 18 November 2022

Accepted: 02 August 2023

Published: 05 August 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39941-6

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.